Up The Quiet Revolution

 

There’s a strange paradox at the heart of modern leadership.

We’re surrounded by tools, data, strategy decks, and success metrics. We have more access than ever to thought leadership, innovation frameworks, and shiny new models for change.

And yet, in meeting rooms across the world, I’ve watched something crucial go missing; quietly, politely, almost imperceptibly. Not the thinking. The feeling.

After two decades in senior leadership, often in high-stakes, high-gloss environments; those marble-floored boardrooms where transformation is discussed like it’s a procurement decision. I’ve come to believe that our greatest blind spot isn’t a lack of intelligence. It’s what I call affective blindness: the systemic under-recognition of emotional dynamics, relational tensions, and what some might call ‘the vibe’ but which is, in fact, the pulse of organisational life.

It’s the unspoken atmosphere in a room when a project derails but no one names what’s really happening. It’s the moment of hesitation in someone’s voice that signals more than their words. It’s the slow corrosion of trust that happens not through failure, but through avoidance.

These moments matter. Not because they’re sentimental or “soft,” but because they’re structural. The emotional undercurrents we sidestep quietly shape the decisions we make, the cultures we build, and the transformations that succeed, or don’t.

And here’s the truth that most leadership literature still tiptoes around: what we don’t feel, we can’t fix.

Don’t get me wrong, the leaders who have made the deepest impact in my experience aren’t flouncing around the boardroom wafting sage and weaving dream-catchers but those who have truly shifted cultures, healed divisions, and genuinely transformed systems have rarely been the loudest voice in the room. They’ve been the most attuned. They could sense when something was off before it became a problem. They could hold space for discomfort without rushing to resolve it. They had the humility to stay curious in complexity, rather than seeking refuge in certainty.

This isn’t mystical. It’s muscular. It’s a different kind of intelligence—embodied, intuitive, relational—and we undervalue it at our peril.

I’ve seen it most often in leaders who’ve never quite fit the mould. Those who’ve had to learn, often by necessity, to read between the lines. Women who’ve led from the margins of assumption. People of colour navigating unspoken codes with diplomatic precision. Neurodivergent thinkers who see patterns where others see chaos. Leaders whose experience of difference has sharpened their perceptiveness like a tuning fork.

I reject the notion this is a “soft skill.” Pay attention. It’s the hard edge of the future.

As the complexity of our world deepens, socially, technologically, ecologically, it’s not more certainty we need from our leaders. It’s more capacity. The capacity to feel what’s happening beneath the surface. To sit with ambiguity. To tune in, before acting out.

And no, I’m not arguing for a leadership style that substitutes instinct for rigour or feeling for accountability. Quite the opposite. I’m calling for a more integrated intelligence, where data and emotion, structure and sensing, planning and presence all have a seat at the table.

Because when we lead only from the neck up, we miss the most vital signals of what’s truly going on.

And when we learn to feel again, not just personally, but systemically, we open the door to deeper insight, more durable change, and cultures that actually support the people inside them.

So no, this isn’t another framework.

It’s a quiet revolution in how we perceive leadership itself.

The future of leadership isn’t about having all the answers - it’s about feeling the questions before they’re asked.

That’s where the real intelligence begins.

Audio Block
Double-click here to upload or link to a .mp3. Learn more
 
Previous
Previous

Send Prayers; I May Have ‘Purpose Fatigue’.

Next
Next

Covid Broke Me, Thank Goodness.